Thursday, October 16, 2014

Advent of MVNO


During my short stay in Germany in 2006, I used a mobile service provider that did not own any infrastructure. By then, I only understood the company as a reseller of O2, later I came to understand that it was a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). The first MVNO was created by Tele2 in Denmark, and subsequently rolled out in several European markets. This model formed the basis between the cooperation between Tele2 and Telia in Sweden. However, the first commercially successful MVNO was Virgin Mobile UK, which was launched in 1999. The success of Virgin Mobile UK was replicated by the United States licensee of the Virgin Mobile brand. Initially an independent company, Virgin Mobile USA was eventually acquired by its host mobile network operator, Sprint Nextel.

As of October 2012 there were 634 active MVNO operations worldwide, which in turn are operated by 503 companies. In April this year, the Communications Authority of Kenya (CAK) recently issued MVNO licenses to Finserve Africa Limited, a subsidiary of Equity Bank, Zioncell Kenya Limited and Tangaza’s Mobile Pay Limited, with the three companies entering into an agreement to use Airtel’s infrastructure. In hot pursuit of the same is Kenya Airways, having signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Airtel to deliver an MVNO service for the airline, subject to regulatory approvals.

An MVNO is a cell phone carrier that typically does not have its own network infrastructure and licensed radio spectrum. An MVNO pays wholesale fees for minutes and SMSs and then sells them at retail prices under its own brand. The advent of MVNO in most countries is as a result of the regulation authority’s intent to compel mobile service providers to offer wholesale access to their network to encourage competition whose aim is to benefit the consumers. As the number of MVNOs increase, the consumer will have a variety of pricing models and value propositions to choose from. The main advantage of MVNOs is that they do not incur capital expenditure on spectrum and infrastructure and does not have the time-consuming task of building out extensive radio infrastructure. These factors make them fiercely competitive and innovative leading to new products and services in the market.

There are some disadvantages to MVNOs. Since they do not control the network infrastructure, the response time to technical challenges is hampered and may lead to instances of customer dissatisfaction. Some MVNOs do not allow roaming, due to lack of commercial agreements with providers in other countries. From the perspective of the mobile network operators, MVNOs cause a cannibalizing effect by targeting the same retail market as them. In some cases, it may lead to a shift of same consumers from the mobile network operator to the MVNO considering it’s essentially the same service rendered.  It is essential for the regulatory authority to consider the merits and demerits of MVNOs as the authority issues licenses. In developed markets MVNOs can avoid cannibalizing a host operator’s subscriber base by targeting low-end segments the MNO might find too costly to tap.

MVNO market in Africa is in its infancy with only a few countries having taken up the concept. South Africa is the leading with several operating and upcoming MVNOs; Virgin Mobile, Redbull Mobile, Econet, Hello Mobile, 8.da and Appchat. In Cameroon there is SET Mobile and SMS Mobility, in Senegal there is Sonatel and Toubatel, Morocco has Poste Maroc, Madagascar has Blueline and Tanzania has Zantel. Virgin’s subscription numbers are closing in on half a million, which probably makes it the biggest MVNO on the continent, although such figures only put it fifth in South Africa and barely noticeable behind the 60 million total of the big three. One of the biggest challenges is how to position an MVNO in a low-income market. Stability of retail pricing will be a key driver as to whether MVNOs can be sustainable in low ARPU markets.

MVNOs have to be innovative. Working with one host network operator across multiple countries sounds ideal; it could mean the same technology platform, contractual agreements and volume discounts on wholesale rates. This is the model Kenya Airways has adopted with Airtel leveraging on the provider Pan African coverage in 17 African countries. In some countries, MVNOs use a mobile virtual network aggregator (MVNA). MVNAs would normally establish scale of their own by working with a number of MVNOs. So far there hasn’t been sufficient activity in Africa to attract aggregators–MVNAs–which enable MVNOs to launch at a lower cost of entry and often greatly facilitate the set-up process. The single enabler–MVNE–model through which operators can cost-effectively host specific strategic MVNOs is more likely in the near term. Some MVNOs have taken advantage of popular established brands during market entry; Cell C’s sub-brand Red Bull has the obvious youth appeal of a ‘cool’ drinks brand. Set’Mobile, on the other hand, which came to market in Cameroon, borrowed the name of the country’s world-famous footballer Samuel Eto’o.