Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Demystifying the Fiber Pulling Challenge


Sam Mwangi

Most often than not, we are enraged when we encounter contractors from various service providers digging the pavements and pathways to lay fiber. Ironically, we then demand for high connection speeds for our Internet service at the office and home.  The fiber pulling activity leads to disruption of certain services that leads to grave economic consequences. We have witnessed traffic jams, busted water pipes and interruption of other public utilities. In part, this is due to the uncoordinated manner in which different providers would lay their fiber infrastructure such that two different providers would be digging the same route within a short timeline, probably ripping up the same road and re-carpeting it within the said time. The other aspect is that the regulating authorities that approve the works do not keep proper records of the plans and of existing infrastructure. In fact, the works plans are submitted in hard copy making it difficult to correlate existing infrastructure vis-a-vis the proposed routes. Of course, soon after the fiber has been laid, there is a possibility of a road contractor cutting it in the process of road construction.
These challenges can be solved in both short term and long term. In the short term, instead of several authorities regulating the fiber laying activities i.e KENHA, KURA, County Governments, CRA and so on, one of them should take charge for better coordination and to avoid confusion. Long term, we need to evaluate the possibility of shared ducts, not just with other fiber providers but also with other utilities like electricity. Cost sharing among the various stakeholders of the duct would ensure efficiency and minimize disruption. There has been progress made in this front, the National Optic Fibre Backbone Infrastructure (NOFBI) provides a shared infrastructure for use by the Government and network operators. However, the infrastructure has been plaque by frequent downtimes causing most network operators to withdraw. The Kenya Power and Lighting Company (KPLC) telecommunications department has also provided fiber over high tension power lines to various providers for connectivity from one part of the country to another.  Multi-media firm, the Wananchi Group, has been using KPLC’s  national electricity transmission network to build a fibre optic platform, especially using electric poles in residential areas. The platform - a product of an agreement between the media firm and Kenya Power and Lighting Company - puts Wananchi on a converged media highway that enables it to compete in television content, internet provision, data and voice transmission markets.
There are various models that can be used to provide a shared duct infrastructure. A single entity such as the county government can deploy the ducts and lease them to the interested parties. Alternatively, a consortium of stakeholders can jointly invest in the ducts and then share the infrastructure. The problem with the initial model is that the county governments cannot afford the deployment and lack capacity to manage it. Most probably, they would require financing from a venture capitalist based on revenue share or an International Bank such as World Bank or African Development Bank.  The second model is that consortiums are unpredictable and difficult to manage. Different stakeholders have different agendas and roadmaps based on their financial capabilities and strategies. In an effort to lay the submarine cable, a consortium of companies and the Government known as TEAMS (The East African Marine System) had delays in implementation that lead the private companies to opt for SEACOM. This illustrates the complexity of consortiums and the unlikelihood of competitors working together. Lastly, the regulatory authorities can digitize the records. There is software that digitizes maps and concatenates all public utilities, fiber routes, water and sewerage routes, underground electric cables and so on. This in comparison with the plan submitted by a service provider in soft would allow for better planning of fiber pulling activities.